There it is, folks: my gusset decreases. By my (rough) calculations, I have about 8 rounds until I can stop decreasing and start knitting the rest of the foot.
I am (in my most secret of hearts) an enormous and fierce complainasaurus, and I’m not loving the pattern. It’s kind of like that part in The Fighter when those over educated folks tell Amy Adams and Mark Wahlberg’s characters about the cinematography in Belle Epoque (1992); over my head and wildly fruitless.
It’s not that it’s complicated. In fact, the pattern could fairly easily be changed into a 2 row repeat with a lil’ something extra every 8 rows. It’s the thoughtless editing that kills me. I get exactly what Morgan-Oakes was going for: a nice faux cable with a bit of faggoting on ‘ere side with lots of 1×1 ribbing for stretchiness and fit. I get it, and I do think that the finished product would look sweet if it were written out exactly the way I wanted it to be. In all fairness, the pictures in the book do show the sock as written; there are just some odd bits that, in a parallel universe, I would fix.
You see, I made a (futile) commitment to myself at the top of the year to start knitting other people’s patterns. I have a square head, and I know that, and so, most of the time I make up what I’m doing. I have many calculators for that reason. I have a colouring book for that reason. I even have lead pencils for that reason. But in music, in knitting, and in life, sometimes you have to concede that there is a lot to learn from what other people are doing, so I elected to knit 11 patterns that I didn’t design.
I’ve cheated remorselessly on this commitment. For instance, I’ve added 1×1 ribbing to this sock, and I’ve ignored gauge because I’m a maverick and sometimes mavericks can’t help but maverick. But the cast on number of stitches needs to be right! And by right, I mean that the stitch pattern shouldn’t require that there be a strip of two knit stitches on ‘ere side of the sock legs. That’s right: on both sides of each sock there is a strip of two knit stitches where there should be a 1×1 rib. See that seam-like thing in the picture below?
The fastest way I can amend this problem is to cast on two fewer stitches per sock; that way, the k1,p1 rib which is then followed by the p1,k1 rib will stay constant by ending with a purl stitch and everything would remain beautiful and perfect in the entire word. The slightly slower way would be to add another stitch to the faux cable. I can slip four stitches! I can! I swear I can! I have lots of faults, but dishonesty isn’t one of them. And again, the picture in the book does show the same seam. I had just assumed that it was due to a tension issue.
I guess my biggest regret isn’t cheating on my commitment one more time. This is causing me so much disatisfaction that I’m near to ripping the whole thing out and starting over.
One think that’s keeping me content is this yarn. Why oh why was it discontinued?
100% wool… ah.